This site uses cookies

By using this site, you consent to our use of cookies. You can view our terms and conditions for more information.

The relationship between diffusion models and Ising decision maker

Jiashun Wang
Ludwig Maximilian University of Munich ~ Department of Psychology
Chris Donkin
LMU Munich ~ Psychology

Within the framework of evidence accumulation there exist a range of models of decision making. The most popular models use relatively simple assumptions about underlying psychological mechanisms, like in the diffusion model. Other models start from plausible neural mechanisms, such as the Ising Decision Maker (IDM), which builds from the assumption that two pools of neurons with self-excitation and mutual inhibition receive perceptual input from external excitatory fields. Here, we explore the consequences of simplifying the decision process. To do this, we simulate data from the IDM and fit it with the diffusion model, looking at the relationship between the three parameters whose meaning is the same in both models: stimulus distinctness (drift rate) , detection box size (boundary separation), and non-decision time. We also explore the ways that the diffusion model, assuming a stable evidence stream, reflects the dynamic nature of the IDM.


There is nothing here yet. Be the first to create a thread.

Cite this as:

Wang, J., & Donkin, C. (2022, November). The relationship between diffusion models and Ising decision maker. Abstract published at MathPsych at Psychonomics 2022. Via