Close
This site uses cookies

By using this site, you consent to our use of cookies. You can view our terms and conditions for more information.

Bayesian analysis of risk- and ambiguity aversion in two information sampling tasks

Authors
Mr. Kristoffer Klevjer
UiT The Arctic University of Norway ~ Department of Psychology
Prof. Gerit Pfuhl
UiT The Arctic University of Norway ~ Department of Psychology
Abstract

Humans are aversive to risk (irreducible uncertainty) and ambiguity (reducible uncertainty). However, strong ambiguity aversion does not necessarily imply strong risk aversion. Further, in real life it can be challenging to attribute uncertainty and one may treat ambiguity as risk. This can lead to biases in information sampling, i.e. premature stopping of collecting information that could reduce uncertainty. These biases in information sampling have also been linked to delusional thinking and hallucination disposition in both healthy individuals as well as in mental disorders like schizophrenia. Modelling allows to identify the processes and aberrances in decision-making. Here, we experimentally investigate these potentially aberrant attributions by using the draws to decision version of the beads task (Huq et al., 1988) and the risk and ambiguity lottery task (Levy et al., 2010). For each participant (N=77) we extracted their risk-, and ambiguity aversion using the hierarchical Bayesian modelling of Decision-Making tasks R-package (hBayesDM; Woo-Young et al., 2017), and used those parameters as predictors for explaining the draws to decision in the beads-task. Preliminary results indicate that a person’s risk aversion but not ambiguity aversion is related to draws to decision in the beads task. This displays both the usefulness and importance of modelling cognitive tasks to better understand and analyze the results from decision-making tasks, as well as its importance in order to better understand and disentangle the underlying mechanisms of everyday biases.

Tags

Keywords

Information sampling
risk and ambiguity aversion
Bayesian modeling
decision making
cognitive psychology

Topics

Decision Making
Bayesian Modeling
Discussion
New

There is nothing here yet. Be the first to create a thread.

Cite this as:

Klevjer, K., & Pfuhl, G. (2020, July). Bayesian analysis of risk- and ambiguity aversion in two information sampling tasks. Paper presented at Virtual MathPsych/ICCM 2020. Via mathpsych.org/presentation/95.