This site uses cookies

By using this site, you consent to our use of cookies. You can view our terms and conditions for more information.

Mixing process and descriptive runners in the race model of response inhibition: a hybrid approach to the stop-signal paradigm

Charlotte Tanis
University of Amsterdam ~ Psychology
Prof. Andrew Heathcote
Univeristy of Amsterdam ~ Psychology
Mr. Mark Zrubka
Dr. Dora Matzke
University of Amsterdam ~ Psychological Methods

Response inhibition is frequently measured using the stop-signal paradigm, where responses must be withheld when a “stop” signal appears. This paradigm assumes that go and stop stimuli trigger competing runners. The first runner crossing a boundary wins, and determines whether a response is performed. A tension exists between two categories of models: descriptive and process models. Descriptive models define the speed of the runners, whereas process models express the latency of going (go RT) and stopping (stop-signal RT) in terms of psychological mechanisms and explain how their distributions emerge. One drawback of the process approach is an inability to recover data-generating parameters and thereby not qualifying as a measurement model. In contrast, the descriptive BEESTS approach recovers these parameters, but the psychological interpretation of its parameters is ambiguous which hampers the understanding of RT differences between groups or manipulations. We propose to mix a process “evidence-accumulation” account of the go runners and a descriptive approach of the stop runner. To instantiate this hybrid approach, we assumed Wald distributions for the finishing times of the go runners and, similar to BEESTS, an ex-Gaussian distribution for the stop runner. This approach results in a practically useful measurement model, with good parameter recovery by Bayesian hierarchical methods in realistic designs. By mixing racers, we garner advantages of both process and descriptive models: all parameters are interpretable in a measurement sense, parameters describing go runners are interpretable psychologically, and the stop parameters can be used to reliably and validly estimate stop-signal RTs.



Choice Behavior
Stop-Signal Paradigm
Reaction Time
Process Models
Descriptive Models

There is nothing here yet. Be the first to create a thread.

Cite this as:

Tanis, C. C., Heathcote, A., Zrubka, M., & Matzke, D. (2021, July). Mixing process and descriptive runners in the race model of response inhibition: a hybrid approach to the stop-signal paradigm. Paper presented at Virtual MathPsych/ICCM 2021. Via